Talk:Rodrigo y Gabriela (album)

Fair use rationale for Image:Rodrigoygabriela.jpg[edit]

Image:Rodrigoygabriela.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:33, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scathing Rolling Stones review[edit]

The actual review from the link consists of three sentences by Robert Christgau. Notice how he gave it 1 and a half stars while the average user rating is 4. I've heard some of their stuff myself and I would agree with some of the comments on the page as well, the music is good. Certainly I don't think this page deserves the stain left by Mr. Christgau. If no one agrees to have it deleted, at least add the amg review[1] which gave it 4 and a half stars. --03:53, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Concluding

I'm down with deleting it, as long as an RS review, if available, isn't some kind of standard for Wikipedia. I found the review ridiculously dismissive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.215.142.195 (talk) 06:04, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely Agree Hello, I have just heard this album and it is amazing. The All user guide is correct, and the rolling stone review should be removed or changed. It doesn't give a clear image of what it is like, and as you said, only one person gave it 1.5 stars.

Also, this album is not exactly what you would call just rock. It is flamenco/mexican music, and rock doesn't describe it well enough.

Cheers, Smidget 904 (talk) 08:58, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Genre[edit]

I usually use wikipedia as a source for what genres to put in the tag when ripping cd's. However, I noticed the lack of a genre field in this article. Sarixe (talk) 03:44, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]