Talk:Roger Cashmore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Controversy Section[edit]

I have deep misgivings about this section. Clearly, there had been a controversy inside Brasenose College on how to treat expenses, and whether the Principal had acted appropriately. But the only reason why this became a public matter is that it was leaked by someone in the college - someone who had it in for the Principal.

By creating a page section on this topic is to simply repeat unfounded allegations - even though nothing was decided - either in a court of law, or of public opinion.

Wikipedia should be a source of unbiased, neutral information and insight. It should not be a forum for biased and unfounded allegations to be repeated.

So I suggest that this section be deleted and replaced with a one-line sentence referring to the matter. GSpier (talk) 18:18, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


The leak of a disagreement on how to treat expenses — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aquamari (talkcontribs) 16:09, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roger Cashmore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]