Talk:Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Francisco

Catholicism Mid‑importance

Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Francisco is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Archbishop Montgomery

While I agree that Archbishop Montgomery should be mentioned on this page, he was not an Auxiliary Bishop and thus should not be on that list (at least without clarification). He was actually the Coadjutor Archbishop. He never succeeded to become Archbishop because he died before Archbishop Riordan.--Dcheney (talk) 02:48, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have adjusted the section. Elizium23 (talk) 02:54, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In 2016, I anonymously noted that 2 bishops of this diocese had been coadjutors. THAT information was placed alongside the respective entries in the bishop-of-the-diocese list. The "coadjutor & auxiliaries" list has a note about that as well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.56.186 (talk) 20:19, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ordinaries Section

It seems odd to have auxiliary and coadjutor bishops listed under a section titled Ordinaries, since by definition, auxiliary and coadjutor bishops are NOT ordinaries!--Dcheney (talk) 16:32, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am still doing anonymous editing, and changed this heading to "Bishops". Also, I have added other priests of this diocese who became bishops, in line with what the catholic-hierarchy site does. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.56.186 (talk) 20:16, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source for "Other priests of this diocese who became bishops"

I have put that section back in. I used the catholic-hierarchy site for this information. For each diocese, it lists affiliated bishops, and it includes some who were not bishop of the diocese OR coadjutor OR auxiliary; it includes a bishop who served any part of his priesthood in that diocese, even if it was not as a bishop. OK?? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.102.56.186 (talk) 20:14, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Francisco. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.catholicnews.com/data/stories/cns/1203179.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050320050109/http://www.sfarchdiocese.org/cathedral.html to http://www.sfarchdiocese.org/cathedral.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Profit/Loss for Population

At first glance, the use of the Profit/Loss indicators suggests things that just aren't true. In particular, the Loss marker before 24.5% strongly suggests that the Catholic population is down by 24.5% - which is not true - it is more like 6%.--Dcheney (talk) 01:53, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]