Talk:Roman Catholic Diocese of Sarsina

Catholicism Low‑importance

Roman Catholic Diocese of Sarsina is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tagged: citation style[edit]

I have tagged this article for its unfortunate abuse of <ref> tags as notes. References should be citations to reliable secondary sources, which this article markedly lacks. Footnotes are made with a different format. The difference should be distinguished here. Elizium23 (talk) 03:17, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the tag and the WP:NPOV fixes which I placed in the article at the same time. If @Vicedomino: insists on using faulty "citation" styles then he will have to live with the maintenance tag. Elizium23 (talk) 06:24, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am happy to live with the tag, if only you will not delete corrections and valid material. I also invite you to find other reliable secondary sources than the ones that I cited frequently. Saying that the article "markedly lacks" reliable secondary sources is incorrect and insulting. --Vicedomino (talk) 06:48, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]