Talk:Roman Emperor (Dominate)
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 October 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
Whole page needs reworking & rewriting[edit]
This entire page has serious issues. Is it meant to be an examination of the constitutional status of emperors post-Diocletian? Or just a list of emperors and their dynastic relations? The initial paragraph, despite reading like Edward Gibbon, indicated the former - yet the body of the article is more a very confused treatment of the latter. The article doesn't currently do anything useful. I think what would be much more sensible would be to create a page about the constitutional status of Roman emperors, and how that changed over time, rather than this unreadable hodgepodge. 93.97.193.226 (talk) 22:24, 13 March 2010 (UTC)