Talk:Ronnie Rocket

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateRonnie Rocket is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleRonnie Rocket has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 29, 2012Good article nomineeListed
December 30, 2021Peer reviewReviewed
February 8, 2022Featured article candidateNot promoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 28, 2012.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that both Michael J. Anderson and Dexter Fletcher were considered for the title role in David Lynch's unfinished film Ronnie Rocket?
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article

Crystal Ball[edit]

Doesn't this article meet the Wiki is not a Crystal Ball criteria? Would tag it for deletion for that but, unsure what tag is appropriate. Please let me know. Jasynnash2 (talk) 14:51, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would definitely say to delete it, since it is not even on imdb.com yet. Mynameisnotpj (talk) 12:44, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
As a matter of fact, this isn't planned on being shot any time soon. It is only a script, as it has been for the past 32 years. That said, whether or not a script by a noteworthy filmmaker is itself noteworthy, I do not know. SoManyWhales (talk) 06:16, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ronnie Rocket/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 16:52, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Infobox: Rather than write a note in the infobox, why not create a notes section, and put the "both attached at different times" note, etc. there. It does kind of make the infobox look messy.
    Seems needless complicated, it's just an explanatory aside and the box isn't particularly cluttered. GRAPPLE X 00:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Overview: "another hallmark Lynch's writings". Huh.
    "hallmark of" now. GRAPPLE X 00:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Overview: "had been" → "were"
    Fixed on both instances. GRAPPLE X 00:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Background: "Lynch" say "David Lynch". It is the first time it was mentioned in the actual article. See WP:MOS.
    Got it. GRAPPLE X 00:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Background: "television series" mystery series?
    Don't know if that flows so well; given that everything else is about film I think "television" is necessary here. GRAPPLE X 00:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • References: Most refs are missing publishers
    Got them. GRAPPLE X 00:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Small, but solid. That's all from me. On hold. TBrandley 17:01, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed or replied to everything listed. Now to actually read that bloody script. GRAPPLE X 00:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I read it. I just didn't find anything issues. Sorry for not clarifying. The article appears good now. Pass. TBrandley 00:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No, I mean I need to read the actual Ronnie Rocket script, I found a copy online but I haven't got round to it yet. GRAPPLE X 00:12, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay. Cool. TBrandley 00:15, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ronnie Rocket. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:49, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]