Jump to content

Talk:Roosseno Soerjohadikoesoemo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk03:09, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • ... that the Dutch ordered Roosseno Soerjohadikoesoemo to destroy bridges, but then the Japanese ordered him to build it back? Source: "When the Japanese came close to invading Java in 194I (he was in his thirties at the time), Mr Roosseno was ordered by the Dutch authorities to destroy bridges. 'One hundred fifty bridges,' he says, and I can hear his smile. Six months later the Dutch surrendered, and the Japanese occupying authorities ordered Mr Roosseno to rebuild the bridges" Mrázek, Rudolf (2004). "Bypasses and Flyovers: Approaching the Metropolitan History of Indonesia" (PDF). Social History. 29 (4): 425–443., p435
    • ALT1:... that Roosseno Soerjohadikoesoemo converted to Christianity, received Christian funerary rites, then was posthumously received back to Islam? Source: "In the end, it was arranged like that: first, the Christian services were held in the woman's house; then to the church, before they brought him here, to Cemara; then we drove him to the mosque, where he was received back to Islam" (same as above, p437)

Moved to mainspace by Juxlos (talk). Self-nominated at 05:06, 29 June 2021 (UTC).[reply]


General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
  • Cited: Yes - Offline/paywalled citation accepted in good faith
  • Interesting: Yes
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Good work. I would prefer the original hook. Epicgenius (talk) 18:37, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]