Talk:Root Sports Southwest

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Houston (inactive)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Houston, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.HoustonWikipedia:WikiProject HoustonTemplate:WikiProject HoustonHouston articles

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Concern

"one of the best Rockets team in the last 10 years" is nowhere close to verifiable by any metric and use of the word "despise" is certainly not encyclopedic.

Sentences have been removed. TomCat4680 (talk) 04:17, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Houston Press source

Royal, John. "Even Wile E. Coyote Must Think CSN Houston Is Poorly Conceived" (Archive). Houston Press. July 3, 2014.

WhisperToMe (talk) 07:06, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New article or re-direct?

Starting November 17, should there be a new article for the new Root Sports version (i.e. Root Sports Houston with this one intact as a defunct channel), or a re-direct to this article with the new information combined with the old (e.g. the CSN info would just be under history section)? Thoughts anyone? I started this article and I'm unsure about what should be done. TomCat4680 (talk) 03:43, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

They bought the channel. It is a continuation and re-branding. Not a completely new network. ViperSnake151 Talk 14:45, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So the second choice then? I agree. You were right too. It's going to be called Root Sports Southwest per their own website. The Houston Chronicle was wrong. TomCat4680 (talk) 02:08, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]