Jump to content

Talk:Rosa Zagnoni Marinoni

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk06:53, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Created by SL93 (talk). Self-nominated at 20:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • Hi, I came by to promote this, but do you think this is enough to draw readers' interest? Many native sons have "days" proclaimed for them. Why not add something about what she did, like who published more than 1,000 short stories or whose poems were published more than 900 times internationally (not sure what that means BTW). But those facts need an inline cite. Yoninah (talk) 00:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Yoninah: Everything is actually cited already. “More than 900 times internationally” means that her poems were published more than 900 times and they were published internationally. I’m not sure what other conclusion someone could come to. I have no idea what your comment about “native sons” receiving days about them means because I have never heard of such a term. There is also the fact that she can’t possibly be someone’s son. SL93 (talk) 01:40, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @SL93: I don't see any inline cite for 1,000 books or 900 poems. Regarding the latter, it could have been the same poem published 900 times for all we know. Perhaps you have a more specific number of poems? A native son is a person who was born in a specific place. If she wasn't born there, the state could have "adopted" her as one of their own. Yoninah (talk) 01:44, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Yoninah: It is cited and I checked the source again. It is the second source. It isn’t cited right after it because it’s not currently the hook. I do know, from the source, that it isn’t only one poem. Try searching for the number “900” in the second source...which has always been in the proper place. SL93 (talk) 01:49, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Yoninah: I will think of a new hook and no, I certainly didn’t type such a thing. I don’t mince what I mean. I was only responding to your comment that part of the article wasn’t cited. Thanks for the copyedit though. SL93 (talk) 01:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]