This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Rosalind Hall is part of WikiProject Brigham Young University, an attempt to write quality articles about Brigham Young University. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Brigham Young UniversityWikipedia:WikiProject Brigham Young UniversityTemplate:WikiProject Brigham Young UniversityBrigham Young University articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales articles
This article was created or improved as part of the Women in Red project in 2018. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Kenmelken (talk·contribs) This user has declared a connection. (I personally know the subject of this article. I believe I can edit and improve without bias.)
ChristensenMJ: I didn't want to start an edit war and decided to take things to the talk page. I noticed that my article organization from earlier today was reverted. I'm setting out on a project to improve this article (I think we can all agree that it needs a lot of work). I don't get lots of time to work on Wikipedia, but am hoping to make a number of expansions and improvements to this article over the next few days. I do think that this article merits at least some subdividing (and certainly will need some when important additions are made). As my time is limited, I certainly would welcome any help you'd like to give. I've been starting with researching more sources to address the maintenance tag and get it off of there, but also hope to add prose. I will wait until that prose is added before adding sections again, but do hope you won't oppose me adding them again at that point.
By the way, I have declared a conflict of interest here, but don't believe it should be a problem. It is true that I know Ros, but I'm acting here as a Wikipedian who sees an article in desperate need of improvement. Hopefully any bias will be kept well in check by focusing on much better sourcing.
Kenmelken (talk) 01:24, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much for your note and efforts, Kenmelken. I think it's great to work on improving the article, as you have explained. As you noted from my edit summary, I still think that an article that is only a relatively few sentences/paragraphs doesn't need any/many section breaks. If there are notable items that are added that would significantly change the length, not just strengthen some of the non-referenced materials, etc., then it may be warranted. Thanks again for your efforts, and for the important COI disclosure. ChristensenMJ (talk) 15:23, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Today during my lunch break I added some fairly large and significant additions to the article. There was nothing previously really detailing any career highlights during her tenure at BYU, so I've added those which I can support with good sources. I still have more to add likely tomorrow, but I do think at this point the article is large enough to merit at least some division/organization. I'm thinking we take the first sentence as a lede (which could also use a little work), then label the next four paragraphs as "Education and Career" and the final three smaller paragraphs as "Recognition". Any objections to that? Kenmelken (talk) 18:19, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks so much! I just glanced briefly at the new content added. Now, with being clear that I don't have any feeling, or view, that I "own" this article.....I would suggest that some of the wording and tone be scaled back some. Work to keep it more "factual" and "encyclopedia-like." This might include removing words like "prolific" and "high number" - particularly with the added COI aspect, just so it's more npov and/or objective, rather than as subjective. That type of wording is usually removed. ChristensenMJ (talk) 18:37, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
