A fact from Rosemary's Baby (miniseries) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 May 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
TonyTheTiger: I mean, I guess it's redundant if we can use either site to extract individual reviews, but since they don't document articles about its production, and I've already formatted them, I don't see what's the harm in keeping them there (until we use them all). Whisternefet (t · c) 17:40, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, RT and M are just reviews. For production info some of the articles above will be helpful. We could shorten the list above by removing those that are redundant with RT and M.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:54, 10 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
As I have stated in the talk page of Son Of Rosemary, doublecross is giving the impression that this series has adapted the sequel novel. Reasoning that the Writers Guild of America (espite that this probably was a mistake) and a "Variety" article. But no episodes have existed of the sequel novel so far.
This will mislead readers who are not familiar with the mini series, and people have pointed out that this tv series only had covered the first novel, and not the second novel.
This must be stated in the wiki, a disclaimer would be helpful like "Despite Son of Rosemary being credited, no episodes are known or yet to exist"
This is not a "original source" this is something that is a fact. There is no episode of Son of Rosemary. Detvanesther (talk) 12:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
