Talk:Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ibidienye.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 08:24, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

this page still sounds like an advert for the RSPO and is in need of extensive revision. Urban-sm (talk) 15:29, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Or maybe just outright deletion. Is it even notable? --Ronz (talk) 17:32, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It's in the news, it apparently influences the decisions of huge-ass corporations, I'd say it's notable. But it does sound like an advertisement. On the other hand there is criticism in the article so it's not too bad. Megalophias (talk) 00:45, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Sustainable"[edit]

This article needs a definition of "sustainable" in as much as it apples to palm oil production. Kortoso (talk) 23:08, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit requested on January 21[edit]

Hi,

I would like to have this page updated as the content is inaccurate but as the RSPO's Communications Manager, I have a conflict of interest.

Could anyone please help?


Thanks and regards, Letchumi Achanah Communications Manager Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil T: +603 2302 1500 F: +60 3 2302 1542 E : letchumi.achanah@rspo.org W: www.rspo.org

Hi Letchumi. To make an edit request, you must specifically indicate the exact text you would removed from the article and the exact text you propose be added to the article, as well as where each of these changes should take place. The edit request backlog is very long, so it may be some time before your request is answered. Thanks, Altamel (talk) 18:17, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You also need to provide reliable sources to support your changes. David Biddulph (talk) 07:13, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WWF[edit]

WWF comes off far to good in this article, IMO. I have no details off my head, but IIRC they're deeply involved in the RSPO scam. Something "Weisswaschmaschine bleibt Weisswaschmaschine" something from Schwarzbuch WWF ... Darsie42 (talk) 17:58, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]