Talk:Royal Institute of Philosophy

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Contemporary philosophy

Not an Advertisement[edit]

I can see what the user meant who tagged this as reading like an advertisement. But you might as well say this about the Royal Society! There are so many Google hit about it that it is hard to find 3-rd party refs but it really is a major society in the UK. In the UK you can't call yourself "Royal" without permission from The Queen, and believe me that's not easy to obtain! NBeale 20:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is relevant is that the style of the lead is non-neutral and unencyclopedic, and looks like it was written by a marketer, so the tag should say. Reinis^talk 11:29, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can Tags Go Now, Please?[edit]

I've tried to tidy this up and add more sources - can the tags about primary sources go now, please? SophiaMSophiahounslow (talk) 09:02, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]