Talk:Royal Medal

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured listRoyal Medal is a former featured list. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page and why it was removed. If it has improved again to featured list standard, you may renominate the article to become a featured list.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 24, 2008Featured list candidatePromoted
March 21, 2022Featured list removal candidateDemoted
Current status: Former featured list

To do[edit]

1826-2006[edit]

  • Complete the list
  • Check all names link to correct articles
  • Try to correct red links
  • Check award mentioned in all articles
  • Start stubs on red links, and mention award
1925 award would be posthumous here, or to a different William Henry Perkin. The 1879 one is probably the correct Perkin. Carcharoth 17:47, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Royal Society database of Fellows reveals that there is a William Henry Perkin who received the Royal Medal in 1925 who is the "Son of Sir William Henry Perkin (FRS 1866)" Scottkeir 14:33, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Mystery solved! Thanks. Carcharoth 15:38, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Found William Henry Perkin, Jr., have changed the "chemist" links to point there. Will fix the other ones to point to the right places. Carcharoth 16:37, 10 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Awards completed and checked from start to 2006. All blue links should now be pointing to the correct people. Red links were checked and some redirects or spelling changes turned them into blue links to the right articles. Remaining red links (as of this date) probably need articles. In case they are turned blue by others creating articles about random American football players (say), I'm going to list the red links below. Not all permutations of redirects involving first and middle initials have been created. This is something that should be done. Also, the list should be double-checked with the Royal Society's list, as a few of them in this article are in the wrong order, and some silent correction of spelling or expanding of names has taken place. Carcharoth 01:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Red links[edit]

If these turn blue, please check they are linking to the right articles. Dates in brackets are the dates the links turned blue.

Added by Carcharoth 01:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC) (and updated at various points thereafter)[reply]

Progress - 17 of about 71 had been created by this point, after about 9 months. Carcharoth (talk) 00:38, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Further progress' - 36 of about 71 had been created or found by October 2008, after about 20 months. Of the pre-1956 era (when only two medals were awarded each year), only 6 redlinks remain (of 273 entries), compared to 29 redlinks (of 132) for the post-1955 era. Carcharoth (talk) 02:01, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just to point out: I'm currently working (in my Sandbox, since many of my experimental changes would've been disruptive to the article) on getting it up to Featured List standard. How is it nobody has noticed that the lead para is one massive copyright violation? Ironholds (talk) 09:51, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for missing that (as I've said elsewhere - at the FLC nomination). Thanks for clearing that up and for adding the rationales and turning the remaining redlinks blue (though 23 one-liners remain to be expanded). There are other points I raised at the FLC that should be raised here after the nomination closes, and I'll try and do that over the next few days. Carcharoth (talk) 09:54, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Number of awards and muitple winners[edit]

Copied from Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Royal Medal

My calculations indicate that from 1826 to 2008 inclusive (183 years), the awards as a whole (i.e. each set of awards for a year, whether one, two or three awards, counting once) have been awarded 181 times (i.e. there were two years when the awards were not made - 1831 and 1832). The total number of medals awarded (i.e. including people who have received more than one Royal Medal) between 1826 and 2008 is 405. There are also 39 cases where people with the same surname received a Royal Medal. Once I've tracked those down (some are different people with the same surname) I'll list them here or on the talk page. That will also give a figure for the number of people awarded the Royal Medal. If this is all too trivial, please feel free to leave it out or relegate to a footnote. I think the number of years (i.e. age of the award) and the number of medals awarded, and the people who have won it more than once, are notable. The copyvio text you removed (it was from the Royal Society website) mentioned that several Nobel Prize winners have recieved the award. Whether you want to mention that or not, I don't know. Carcharoth (talk) 09:55, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple and possibly related winners[edit]

Above list to be updated shortly. Please note that it is a working document and not intended for the main list. The only things that might be needed for the main list are cases where the same person won the award more than once, and where father and son (or mother and daughter) won the award. Unrelated people mustn't be mentioned, as this would be pure trivia. Carcharoth (talk) 09:57, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Six times when someone won the award again. One person did so three times (John Herschel). Hence, from 1826 to 2008, there have been 405 medals awarded to 399 people. Carcharoth (talk) 12:25, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Society website architecture[edit]

Noting here that the Royal Society seem to have changed their website architecture (again). This means that the links and sources in the current version of the list no longer work, simply dumping those who click on them on the Royal Society's main page. The link needed is http://royalsociety.org/awards/royal-medal/ and the list of awards and citations is now a scrollable inset something at the bottom of that webpage. Carcharoth (talk) 15:10, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah; I've fixed some of it, and will get round to the rest when I have a free moment. Ironholds (talk) 12:55, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]