Talk:Ruby Dee

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The photograph in this article was taken by Carl Van Vechten in 1966, according to the caption. However, Van Vechten's article says that he died in '64. What do we make of this? --djrobgordon 17:00, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My project[edit]

hello im Alex! im doing a report on Ruby Dee if you have any info thats good for a 11 year old girl email me at <email redacted>!!! please! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.62.163.62 (talk) 16:51, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

China Beach/Ossie Davis information[edit]

Hello all,

What appears to be an incorrect sentance regarding Ossie Davis' appearance in Skylark. One of my favorite episodes of China Beach and I have never found Mr. Davis either in the show nor in the credits. I believe who you might be remembering here is Joe Seneca who played Ernie.

The sentance "Her husband Ossie Davis (1917–2005) also appeared in that episode." Just needs to be stricken.

Thank you Jim Haseman --Jim haseman (talk) 14:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Year of Birth[edit]

Sources say that Ruby Dee was born in 1924. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.34.211 (talk) 04:22, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Read the footnotes and the New York Times article in which she acknowledges she was born in 1922. Quis separabit? 16:22, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Age of being nominated[edit]

She was 85 years old when she was nominated for American Gangster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.34.211 (talk) 00:37, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

no such thing as death from 'natural causes'[edit]

Off topic

this is age discrimination. the term is never used on younger people's deaths, and the actual cause is given. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.176.108.8 (talk) 01:19, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

birth year[edit]

If she was born in 1924 then her death age is 89 if she was 91 when she died then she was born in 1922 as some sources states...so what do we do? --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 02:12, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Now, Wait a Minute[edit]

Though "Wiki" has Ms. Dee's birth and death date correct, elsewhere in the American media I've heard that she died at the age of 81-and with such consistency by said multiple media. --65.88.88.125 (talk) 16:02, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Veryverser[reply]

We cite CNN, The Washington Post, CBS, The New York Daily News and The New York Times. Looks pretty solid to me. Where are you seeing anything else? - SummerPhDv2.0 17:43, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Ruby Dee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:09, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ruby Dee. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:24, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Theleekycauldron (talk) 20:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

( Comment or view )
( Article history links:
)

Created by Battleofalma (talk). Self-nominated at 12:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC). General eligibility:[reply]

  • New enough: No - No, neither article has been recently created, expanded, or improved to Good Article status. The Ruby Dee article has not even been edited at all.
  • Long enough: Yes

Policy compliance:

Hook eligibility:

  • Cited: No - Didn't check
  • Interesting: No - No, but neither article is eligible anyway.

QPQ: No - Not applicable here, as the nomination is ineligible; if this were eligible, the DYK credit linked above would not count as a review.

Overall: @Battleofalma: Unfortunately, I will have to fail this nomination per WP:DYKRULES. Neither of these two pages has been created, expanded fivefold, or improved to Good Article status within a week of the nomination. (Anna Lucasta hasn't been expanded fivefold since 2014 and Ruby Dee hasn't been expanded at all). Additionally, there are some sourcing problems with Ruby Dee's article. If you do improve either article to Good Article status, though, then that article can be renominated. Epicgenius (talk) 14:06, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Role in the Television & Stage sections[edit]

There was a suggestion on this page that there should be a table created for the Television and Stage sub sections, before implementing a table I wanted to get y'alls thoughts on if her her roles should be added to this table as well in the television and stage sections? Dobblesteintalk 21:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ruby_Dee&oldid=1194897602"