Talk:Rumaila oil field

Energy High‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Western Asia: Iraq / Kuwait Mid‑importance

	Asia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Western Asia, which collaborates on articles related to Western Asia. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Western AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject Western AsiaTemplate:WikiProject Western AsiaWestern Asia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Iraq portal This article is supported by WikiProject Iraq (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kuwait (assessed as High-importance).

More than slant drilling

Kuwait also produced more than agreed, whether slant drilling (discredited) or not, prior to Iraq invasion. http://www.nytimes.com/1990/09/03/world/confrontation-in-the-gulf-the-oilfield-lying-below-the-iraq-kuwait-dispute.html?pagewanted=2&src=pm Mydogtrouble (talk) 18:07, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rumaila oil field

Not 20 miles away. Less than 4 miles away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Longinus876 (talk • contribs) 07:44, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Rumaila oil field. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:48, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clairfy last sentence in introduction

I've added the ^{[clarification needed]} tag to the last sentence in the introduction as I've found it to be unsatisfactorily ambiguous. Regular financial investment? Physically replacing 200,000 barrels of oil back into the reservoir? Where is the lost production arising from?

I'd love to bring some more clarity to these claims, but as the citation listed for this sentence is behind a paywall, I am not able to do that. A less-than-cursory bit of internet research has been unsuccessful in yielding the information I'm looking for. Illini407^talk 16:13, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]