Talk:Rumford Medal

"No Award"

What is the purpose of having rows with "No Award" in them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rfwebster (talk • contribs) 19:11, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Rayleigh

The 1920 award was given not to John Strutt (3rd Baron Rayleigh) who died in 1919, but to his son, Robert Strutt (4th Baron Rayleigh). This can be proved by his biography (see page 505). --80.94.164.195 (talk) 12:51, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

That is correct, I've changed it in the article. Despite being a featured list I don't think enough research was done here. Hence when the RS society stated that it was Baron Rayleigh that received the award, no attempt was made to find out which it was. Benea (talk) 15:18, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Fresnel

Quite a lot of sources, some of them quite reputable, give the year of Fresnel's award as 1827, shortly before his death. Some even specifiy the month before his death. Some other sources, including the RS itself, have the award in 1824. This would fit with the tradition of the award made every other year, since even with years with no awards, 1827 would be out of sequence. This discrepancy is unusual. Given that there is so little information on the background of the award, which might cast some light on the history of this, I'm surprised to see this is a featured article/list. The majority seems to come from the RS website, which is no doubt reputable. But with the statement 'The Rumford Medal is awarded biennially (in even years)', can we safely extrapolate and say that this was always the case? Benea (talk) 17:47, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Rumford Medal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/20120720190100/http://www.archiveshub.ac.uk/news/0609hinton.html to http://www.archiveshub.ac.uk/news/0609hinton.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111002174723/http://www.combustion.org.uk/newsletterjul08/weinberg.html to http://www.combustion.org.uk/newsletterjul08/weinberg.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090320013836/http://www.rse.org.uk/fellowship/obits/obits_alpha/spear_w.pdf to http://www.rse.org.uk/fellowship/obits/obits_alpha/spear_w.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081013215123/http://www.seaes.manchester.ac.uk/aboutus/staff/staffprofile.php?id=59 to http://www.seaes.manchester.ac.uk/aboutus/staff/staffprofile.php?id=59

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:04, 8 September 2017 (UTC)