Jump to content

Talk:Runar Søgaard

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


POV

[edit]

The short article is terrible POV and currently sounds like a defense speech concerning Søgaard's anti-Islamic comments. I, as an uninformed visitor of the article also finds it confusing that the article claimed that his comments on Buddha didn't get the same attention, yet it is discussed in the very Aftonbladet article used as a source for the claim. I also find calling Jan Guillou "pro-Islam" to be quite controversial and so I put in a source template, but it's possible I'm just uninformed on the subject. - quispiamtalk [Anton Nordenfur] 04:33, 22 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Runar Søgaard. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:01, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]