Talk:Runic inscriptions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Perhaps reduce scope to Elder Futhark inscriptions. THe Younger Futhark corpus should be treated at Runestone, or else in a standalone article. --dab (𒁳) 09:54, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now I have moved it I think this was a bad idea, and perhaps Runic inscriptions was better. I suppose this will depend on how the article develops further. --dab (𒁳) 14:30, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]