Talk:Runkeeper

Apps Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status
Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles

"Brazilian" its not a language — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:8A0:4236:7501:44A2:77A1:C8DD:D029 (talk) 09:33, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because I literally just started writing it. Not even close to finished. I'm also unaffiliated with the application.

Cleanup

Hello, I've had a go at attempting to clean the article up a little (Added the info box, rewritten the intro line and did some rejigging the about section). Not entirely sure what the criteria is for removing the "cleanup" required notice is, so have left it in place for now. But if anyone could point me at this info / give a second option on what still needs to be tweaked that would be great. - Bag (talk) 23:11, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A more interesting narrative needs to be created so it doesnt look like promotional writing. There must be comments in those articles or other that describe how the app was conceived and initially developed, the growth of the user base and comments from fitness experts or reviewers. There are certainly a few scholarly articles that should ve looked at. There's no comments here about the connnection to the website and the additional functionality available like creating routes or joining training programmes. --Davoloid (talk) 01:11, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well done...now just need to link to other wiki pages I believe Thisandthem (talk)

I don't think anything has been written yet. I meant articles like this http://mobihealthnews.com/30727/in-depth-digital-health-apis-every-health-startup-should-know/ which show the wider context and recent trends of health graph APIs. the opening paragraph seems to have added a comment about Withings but this looks clunky. --Davoloid (talk) 23:42, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]