Jump to content

Talk:Rupert Bunny

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This is a truly dreadful article for such a famous Australian and fine artist. Come on Wikipedia, you can do better than this! (I can't, I never met the man ;-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.212.129.130 (talk) 06:31, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

[edit]

Template:Did you know nominations/Rupert Bunny -- 13:34, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk20:51, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rupert Bunny self-portrait
Rupert Bunny self-portrait
  • ... that the French state acquired 13 of Rupert Bunny's (self-portrait pictured) works for French museums? (agnsw)
    • ALT1:... that Rupert Bunny (self-portrait pictured) gained an honourable mention at the Paris Salon of 1890 with his painting Tritons? (agnsw)

5x expanded by Alice Batt (talk). Self-nominated at 11:53, 21 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]

  • Hi, thanks for working on this article. At the moment, substantial chunks of it do not have any obvious citations, thereby failing WP:V. This will need to be fixed before the article can be featured at DYK. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:46, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Vanamonde, it seems to have enough refs now. Johnbod (talk) 13:44, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Johnbod: it's much improved, but there's still a couple of bits in "Career" that need sourcing. Also, anyone is welcome to review this; my comment was just to highlight an obvious concern. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:20, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Vanamonde93: everything is referenced now :) (Talk)
full review needed. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:54, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • New enough and large enough expansion. QPQ-exempt (0 credits). Both hooks check out with appropriate citations and the article has a sufficient reference load. Alice Batt, might I suggest an amendment to ALT0 to note that 13 works was more than any other Australian had purchased by France? ALT1 is good to go now but ALT0 feels like it might need that additional punch (though it works too). Raymie (tc) 21:54, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]