Talk:Russia in the Eurovision Song Contest 1995/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 09:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Time to get rid of this old nomination! --K. Peake 09:32, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

  • The songwriters are not directly sourced anywhere in the body as they should be
  • Wikilink Philipp Kirkovov in the lead
  • "to select Russian entrant." → "to select the Russian entrant."
  • To avoid the lead being too cluttered, you should start a new para at Vocal Band
  • "due to the band members being" → "due to the members being"
  • Wikilink music video
  • I think it is worth noting that the placing was their worst result
    Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Background[edit]

  • Introduce RTR and ORT by their full names per this being the first mentions in the body
  • "which will represent Russia" → "which would represent Russia"
    Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before Eurovision[edit]

Evrovidenie "Pesnya-95"[edit]

  • Wikilink Philipp Kirkorov on the img text
  • "jury came to" → "the jury came to"
    Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Table looks good!

Internal selection[edit]

  • "due to the group's members inability" → "due to the members' inability"
  • Wikilink Philip Kirkorov
  • Wikilink music video
  • "to the public on 30 April 1995" → "to the public the next day"
    Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At Eurovision[edit]

  • Img looks good!
  • Pipe previous year's contest to Eurovision Song Contest 1994
  • "participation in 1994 contest" → "participation in the 1994 contest"
  • "didn't participate in 1994 contest." → "didn't participate in this contest."
  • "in 1994 contest," → "in the 1994 contest," but where is this 17 part sourced?
  • "Philipp Kirkorov took part in" → "Kirkorov took part in"
  • "on 8 and 10 May," → "on 8 and 10 May 1995,"
  • "wearing white shirt and" → "wearing a white shirt and"
  • "was the Russia's worst placing" → "was Russia's worst placing"
  • "had won the contest;" → "had emerged as winners;"
  • "the Russian singer."" only keep inside speech marks if this is a full sentence per MOS:QUOTE
    Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Voting[edit]

  • "for 1995 contest," → "for the Eurovision Song Contest 1995," since this is a new sub section
  • "to the ten highest-ranking songs" → "to the 10 highest-ranking songs" per MOS:NUM
  • "assembled 16-member jury panel," → "assembled a 16-member jury panel,"
  • Pipe Lora Kvint to Квинт, Лора Геннадьевна
    Everything's done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Table looks good!

References[edit]

  • Copyvio score looks phenomenal at 4.8%!!!!
  • Why is EBU only in brackets on ref 1?
    Removed - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fix MOS:QWQ issues with refs 2 and 18
    Can you explain in more detail what needs to be done, because I tried to fix it, but it got worse and messy. Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Ref 4 is government owned, so are you sure about the reliability?
    Removed - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fix MOS:QWQ issues with ref 7 and what exactly makes this source reliable?
    Removed - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • What is ref 8 and why is it reliable?
    Removed - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Pipe Raidió Teilifís Éireann to RTÉ
    Done - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Is ref 20 WP:USERG?
    I don't think so. I looked through this site and found no evidence that this site is self-published. - Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bibliography[edit]

Final comments and verdict[edit]

  •  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; this should not take very long! --K. Peake 17:14, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Pinging the nominator: {{u|Danilmay}}, since this article has not been change since this review has been on hold for 6 days now. — VAUGHAN J. (TALK) 20:24, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

K. Peake, I've made almost all the changes you've requested. Only I had one question (added above). Danilmay (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danilmay MOS:QWQ issues are when you have used double speech marks inside reference titles; replace with singular ones ('). --K. Peake 15:17, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

K. Peake: Done - Danilmay (talk) 17:55, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Pass now, this is totally fine! --K. Peake 19:16, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]