Jump to content

Talk:Russian cruiser Bayan (1907)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Starstriker7 (talk · contribs) 07:46, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will also do this review. --Starstriker7(Talk) 07:46, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Criterion 1

[edit]

Lead

[edit]
  • The other Russian warship articles I've seen have the name of the ship in Russian Cyrillic. If possible, add these.
  • "During World War I she was modified to lay mines shortly after the war began and laid mines herself and provided cover for other ships laying minefields." - Break up the sentence using commas.
    • Broken into two sentences.
  • "during the German invasion of the Estonian islands in late 1917 and was badly damaged." - Change to "in late 1917, where she was badly damaged"?
    • Done.

Design and description

[edit]
  • "In addition four more six-inch guns were added, two on each broadside." - Comma after "in addition".
    • Good catch.

Battle of Moon Sound

[edit]
  • "Bayan and the predreadnought Grazhdanin engaged the German minesweepers clearing the minefields guarding the entrance while the predreadnought Slava duelled with the dreadnoughts König and Kronprinz." - This sentence is kind of blocky. Can this be rephrased?

Criterion 2

[edit]

No issues here, as far as I can see.

Criterion 3

[edit]

In my experience with these reviews, the article is both sufficiently broad and well-focused.

Criterion 4

[edit]

No undue weight is given to any one side. The article is written in a neutral tone.

Criterion 5

[edit]

Edit history is quiet.

Criterion 6

[edit]

The picture's copyright status is tagged and checks out. No caption is needed here, and the image is relevant.

Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:24, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. I am passing it now. --Starstriker7(Talk) 03:18, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Overall comments

[edit]

Once again, nice work. As with the Pallada, there are just a few grammar/diction nitpicks. --Starstriker7(Talk) 07:41, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]