Talk:Ryan Grant

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Green Bay Packers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Green Bay Packers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Green Bay PackersWikipedia:WikiProject Green Bay PackersTemplate:WikiProject Green Bay PackersGreen Bay Packers articles

Disambiguation

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Requested move 16 March 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved. (non-admin closure) Simplexity22 (talk) 20:14, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

– There is no main primary topic for this name. I don't think that this American football running back should take precedence over the rugby union player or the wide receiver of the same name. Natg 19 (talk) 10:37, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I beg to differ. He is known, more widely, than the rugby player, as well as the wide receiver of the same name. So, until either one of them warrant it, I would leave the running back at Ryan Grant. ^{(talk page stalker)} CrashUnderride 11:20, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. It does not appear that the running back has such overwhelming notability that it would enable him to maintain far higher positioning than the two other same-named sports figures. —Roman Spinner (talk)(contribs) 07:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Pageviews do not clearly support "A topic is primary for a term with respect to usage if it is highly likely—much more likely than any other topic, and more likely than all the other topics combined—to be the topic sought when a reader searches for that term." per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:15, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Shhhnotsoloud:, can you clarify your comment? I'm not clear if you are in favor of the move, or not. Natg 19 (talk) 05:58, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I support the proposed moves because I agree there is no clear primary topic. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 06:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support a dab page at the base term. The other American football player is the most prominent, if anything. A dab page is best though since it might not be obvious when the wrong player is being linked to. —Xezbeth (talk) 08:09, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. No clear primary topic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:14, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.