Talk:Sól (Germanic mythology)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   The section on the Merseburg Incantation is unreferenced. Or is this an autoreference, with the naming of the source implying the reference?

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   One reference, and it will pass. Arsenikk ^(talk) 12:38, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing the article! I've put the reference in place and made a few adjustments per Lindow's translation. :bloodofox: (talk) 17:42, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Excellent. In which case I pass the article as Good. Congratulations! Arsenikk ^(talk) 17:59, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Great, thanks! :bloodofox: (talk) 18:10, 11 October 2008 (UTC)