Talk:SEAT Toledo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Hi,

This article states that the Toledo I was based on a VW Golf MKII chassis. Others articels on the Web state it was based on a VW Golf MKIII chassis. Does anyone know the true facts on this and can state from a reliable source which one is correct?

Thank you.

Zak

Motor racing?[edit]

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a highly modified racing version of the Toledo used in the FIA GT Championship? I've noticed on various FIA GT websites that there are pictures of a second-gen Toledo with widened wheelarches, a huge rear wing and other modifications for racing. If the car is used for international motorsport, then there should be a reference in the article to it, because I came to this article hoping for information on this matter. If someone could enlighten me on the subject, that would be great. Happy Easter, Stealthman (talk) 09:13, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"The Exeo will not be a replacement for the Toledo according to the company."[edit]

Well, no, the Altea XL pretty much directly replaced the Toledo Mk III, dinnit? Not sure what to do about this section; anyone who feels up to it should update it. -- CRConrad (talk) 22:07, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree with you CRConrad. The statement that "The Exeo will not be a replacement for the Toledo according to the company." has been made by the company itself, since there was a need to clarify things due to the fact that both Exeo&Toledo are family oriented sedans. The reason why the Altea XL wouldn't directly replace the Toledo Mk3 is that the Altea/XL/Freetrack is a SUV in a two-box design, whilst the Exeo as well as the Toledo are meant to be sedans in a three-box design configuration. Certainly there are rumors that a replacement for the Toledo is going to be released next year, i.e. the Toledo Mk4 based on a three-box design derived from the future Leon Mk3, but WP should only include facts, this is why I am not adding such a comment. In conclusion, the section should stay as it is.(LeonCR (talk) 05:36, 8 May 2011 (UTC))[reply]