Jump to content

Talk:SIS Building

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Stormbreaker Series

[edit]

The SIS building doesn't feature in the books, to the best of my knowledge. The headquarters building for Special Operations in the series is in a "bank" on Liverpool Street. As such I've removed the entry untill someone can provide evidence of it's appearance in one of the books. 86.9.213.112 (talk) 19:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Who the hell cares XD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.219.146.110 (talk) 14:00, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on SIS Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:42, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:SIS Building/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 06:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing this article. MWright96 (talk) 06:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Background

[edit]
  • Change modernizing to modernising
  • The acronyms of the National Audit Office need to be included in brackets

Design and construction

[edit]
  • Remove the duplicate link to the National Audit Office
  • £152.6m and £135.05m should both be changed to £152.6 million and £135.05 million
  • 12,000 m2 needs a convert template with the square feet measurement included

Recent history

[edit]
  • Writing in The Telegraph after the attack, - Should be The Daily Telegraph for consistency

References

[edit]

That is what I found. On hold. MWright96 (talk) 13:22, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96: Thank you, I've made all of your suggested changes. Gareth E. Kegg (talk) 16:29, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nice. Happy to promote to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 16:47, 19 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on SIS Building. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]