Talk:SMS Kaiserin/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: White Shadows ^{We live in a beautiful world} 00:25, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS): The prose is good and the article does follow MOS. No issues here. With your permission, I changed the "Footnotes" section to just "Notes" as one of the subsections was already titled "Footnotes". Feel free to revert me but I only changed it to avoid confusion for the reader.
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): No issues here. Excellent as always.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views): No sort of bias present.
It is stable.
No edit waring or issues with the content.
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
Overall:
a Pass/Fail:

I'll be reviewing this GAN Parsec. After looking over her, I'll come back to you with any comments or questions ;)--White Shadows ^{We live in a beautiful world} 00:25, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Everything checks out. I just need your OK for that one change I made and I'll pass this GAN.--White Shadows ^{We live in a beautiful world} 03:40, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Looks fine to me. Thanks for reviewing the article, WS. Parsecboy (talk) 03:46, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alright then. This article easily passes GAN. Good luck with any future work on this (ACR, FA) I'll be updating the article now....--White Shadows ^{We live in a beautiful world} 03:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]