Talk:SMS Prinzregent Luitpold

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleSMS Prinzregent Luitpold is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starSMS Prinzregent Luitpold is part of the Battleships of Germany series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 19, 2013.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 11, 2011Good article nomineeListed
February 14, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
August 25, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
August 21, 2012WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
May 2, 2013Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 4, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the German battleship SMS Prinzregent Luitpold was the only ship of her class designed to mount a diesel engine, though it was never fitted?
Current status: Featured article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Prinzregent Luitpold/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:33, 11 January 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    No supporting cites for armor protection. You can either cite the specifics in the infobox or add a short descriptive paragraph with a cite.
    Citations added. Parsecboy (talk) 22:45, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    You've got three different speed figures in the lede, the infobox and the main body. Choose one and stick with it.
    Dang copy-paste errors...thanks for catching that. Parsecboy (talk) 22:45, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

the eighth ship in the line?[edit]

I think this is wrong:the eighth ship in the line, directly astern of Kaiserin and ahead of Friedrich der Grosse. What I remember is that Friedrich der Grosse was the eighth, so Prinzregent_Luitpold should be the seventh. --Demostene119 (talk) 14:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you're right. The four Königs led the line, followed by Kaiser, Kaiserin, then Prinzregent Luitpold. I'll fix it shortly - good catch. Parsecboy (talk) 16:46, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on SMS Prinzregent Luitpold. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:57, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Broken link for Hundsort[edit]

I don't speak German, Russian or Estonian. So I can't 100% verify this is true.
The wiki page for Tagalaht (a bay in the Baltic Sea) says that it is between the Tagamõisa peninsula and another place. It also says that in German the Tagamõisa peninsula is called Hundsort. They are all in the right area, but that doesn't mean that I got everything right.

If this is true, it would be nice if someone who can verify it would add a link from Hundsort to Tagamõisa. Or, since there are very few references to Hundsort in the English wikipedia pages, just change this pages link to Tagamõisa.
2600:8801:8500:269:E9A4:DE00:9569:BC3D (talk) 10:07, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've created a redirect for it - Hundsort is also the name of the location in Swedish, so it's worthwhile to have the redirect established. Parsecboy (talk) 12:46, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]