Talk:SMS Rheinland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleSMS Rheinland is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic starSMS Rheinland is part of the Battleships of Germany series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 7, 2010Good article nomineeListed
July 20, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
August 20, 2010WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
January 22, 2011Featured article candidatePromoted
August 25, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 22, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in order to refloat her after running aground off Finland in 1918, SMS Rheinland needed 6,400 metric tons of equipment removed, more than a third of her normal displacement?
Current status: Featured article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:SMS Rheinland/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Fix the things I've noted in the text.
    I reworded the first and clarified the second. How does it look now? Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    B. MoS compliance:
    Publisher location needed for Tarrant
    Added. Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
    Is another picture available?
    I haven't been able to find any other images of the ship; there's a somewhat bad linedrawing in the 1911 Brasseys (here) - that might be worth uploading and adding to the article. I did add a photo of the Black Prince to the Jutland section. Parsecboy (talk) 02:20, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    I like plan views for all of these early dreadnoughts so you can show what the odd turret arrangements looked like rather than relying only on a textual description. But it's your call, though I'd look for a better scan than that one.
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

torpedo tubes[edit]

5 in the infobox, 6 in the text -- possibly in all the articles for the class Suppongoche (talk) 17:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, fixed. Parsecboy (talk) 00:15, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]