Talk:SMS Wacht/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 03:18, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Review

  • The toolbox checks out.
  • "an aviso, of the Imperial German Navy": an aviso of the Imperial German Navy
  • "Her crew's crew": ?
  • "three 10.5 cm (4.1 in) K L/35 gun": ... guns
    • All fixed - thanks for reviewing this, Dan. Parsecboy (talk) 16:34, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Otherwise:
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Passed. - Dank (push to talk) 23:19, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]