Talk:SM U-10 (Austria-Hungary)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSM U-10 (Austria-Hungary) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSM U-10 (Austria-Hungary) is part of the German Type UB I submarines series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 4, 2010Good article nomineeListed
March 15, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 10, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that SM U-10 and SM U-11, which were U-10-class submarines constructed in Germany and shipped to Austria-Hungary by rail, were both commissioned into the German Imperial Navy and the Austro-Hungarian Navy during World War I?
Current status: Good article

Photo[edit]

Is this image possibly one of these subs? Jehochman Talk 21:35, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, unfortunately not. That's a minelaying sub rather than one that fires torpedoes as U-10 was. Thanks for the suggestions, though. There must be a photo of one of these out there somewhere… — Bellhalla (talk) 21:55, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oddly, this image is only used in Submarine. Perhaps there is an article on this class of minelaying sub? It may be worth searching the archives where this image was found to see if they have anything we could use. Jehochman Talk 22:00, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In fact, this photo may actually be of one of these subs (at least the German version) rather than the Type UC I that the Imperial War Museum claims it is. See the recent discussion in Talk:German Type UC I submarine for more details. However, since the sub's identity in this picture is in doubt, it would be a poor choice for an illustration. --Colin Douglas Howell (talk) 21:01, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]