Talk:SM U-3 (Austria-Hungary)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with a suggestion for future development. This is not required to achieve GA standard, but might help in future A-class or FAC review process.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
It is stable.
It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):

No images, although if one could be found it would improve things.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Only a minor thing, but it might be interesting to have some more information on the unsuccessful cruises made by U-3 in 1914-15 before the commander was changed. It might also be good to comment on this change, is there any known reason for it (i.e. a lack of aggression by the previous commander). In any case, the early patrols and the change in command could be mentioned in the text.--Jackyd101 (talk) 23:43, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]