Jump to content

Talk:SNOCAP

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fees?

[edit]

Any information about the fees they take would be nice -- Anselm

24.3.223.215 23:37, 26 April 2007 (UTC)exactly. They don't mention the fact that they take 45cents out of a 99cent download.[reply]


Horrible Website

[edit]

If this article ever gets expanded, it's worth noting how abysmally slow and terrible the website is. In a nicer way, of course. 64.0.144.163 17:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"In a nicer way" isn't what matters, what matters is what is verifiable. Anything on this subject other than quoting or citing an opinion in a published and notable editorial would qualify as original research. bradkittenbrink (talk) 18:17, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recently?

[edit]

Is there any way of dating the references to "recently" in the article? It would be nice to know what "recent" is. 70.121.101.14 (talk) 04:01, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Out of date

[edit]

This is out of date given that MySpace bought iMeem. Mathiastck (talk) 23:41, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on SNOCAP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:39, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]