Talk:SN 2010lt
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2011 discovery
[edit]Why is this a "2011" discovery? The supernova is datecoded in 2010, the (12*26+20)th of the year. 64.229.103.44 (talk) 10:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
- I think because it was imaged on New Year's Eve, but Gray didn't notice it until Sunday. Sceptre (talk) 17:57, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
The Discovery image was taken on New Year's eve 2010, so they numbered it 2010 otherwise it would have been the first in 2011, doh! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dave7331 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 6 January 2011 (UTC)
previous youngest
[edit]The news said that the previous youngest person to discover a supernova was her father, who became the youngest for one he discovered in 1995. 64.229.103.44 (talk) 10:41, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Position in infobox
[edit]Dave Lane writes: Galaxy's position: 06:06:20.8, +83°50'19" and Supernova's position: 6h06m09s.18, +83°50'28".8. So, position in article's infobox is the position of galaxy, not of SN 2010lt. Newone (talk) 03:34, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
Other SN?
[edit]In the up-right corner of Lane's image was some thing flickering? Newone (talk) 02:15, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
- Start-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- Start-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class New Brunswick articles
- Low-importance New Brunswick articles
- WikiProject New Brunswick articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages