Talk:SR Merchant Navy Class 35018 British India Line

Trains: in UK / Locomotives Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	August 2, 2019

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations.

Use of photographs in this article

Can we check the photographs in this article for (1) relevance and (2) technical qualities? Tony May (talk) 05:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

1. This has a platform covering part of the engine, and though the exposure isn't bad, it is taken from the shadow side. I think there are better photos.
2. This is a historical photo and should be included, even though its condition is different.
3. I'm not sure we need both this one and the next one. This is too small, suggest ditching it.
4. I'm not sure we need both this one and the previous one
5. Again, one of a sequence.
6. 35018 with Bodmin nameplates making its first moves on the mainline since 1964.
7. A photo of a wrong nameplate.
8. This is also a pretty good photo - sunshine, and very clear.
9/ This is also a pretty good photo
10. This is also a pretty good photo -

I suggest we remove 1, 3,5,7, and include most of 2,4,6, 8,9,10. Tony May (talk) 15:18, 25 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IUP should be our guide. To my mind this is a case where a gallery has been justified. The images not used will of course still be available in commons. I agree with the removal of 1,3,5 and 7. I agree with the inclusion of 2,4,6 and 9 and one of 8 and 10 which show the left side, with a slight preference for 10 as it is the only one with 35018 chuffing away. I had not checked the identity of the photographers before making my choices but as Tony May may be prevented from removing one image I would be happy to do so after a week or two pause for other commentsSovalValtos (talk) 10:44, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was considering starting the change of photos when I realised a decision on infobox pic had not been made. Ideas Tony May? I would have liked an early one but the only one we have (2) is best used in the gallery. Perhaps 10 chuffing?SovalValtos (talk) 15:30, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please go ahead and make changes, [[User:SovalValtos and trust your own judgement. 8 or 10 I think should be the main one. Neither is perfect, magazine-quality but it'll do until something better becomes available. Tony May (talk) 15:40, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]