Talk:SS Kentuckian/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 18:48, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- The first two images (in the Early career section" are really close together, and they sandwich a lot of text between themselves and the infobox. Could one of the pictures (the bottom one?) be moved down into the next section? I realize there's already an image in that section, but one of them could be right aligned to avoid stacking.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Congrats on another great article - there are no real problems, so I am passing the article to GA status. There is one minor comment regarding the images, but this is not enough to keep the article from passing to GA. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 19:02, 10 September 2008 (UTC)