Talk:SS Samuel Huntington/GA1

GA Review

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   "British cruiser Spartan was hit amidships and rolled over on her port side and sank with a loss 65 men." typo

   fixed — Bellhalla (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   "on the ways" - I'd prefer this be linked to what "the ways" are. I can figure it out in context, but what if I wanted to read more about it? Wolfpack should link to Wolf pack. On a side note, there should be some {{disambig}} tags there...

   linked "ways" to wikitionary — Bellhalla (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

   corrected link to "wolf pack" (also added {{otheruses}} to that page.) — Bellhalla (talk) 03:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I've left comments, but the fixes are so minor as to be negligible - just don't forget to do them. Good read! —Rob (talk) 19:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)