Jump to content

Talk:SS West Cheswald/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Hi! I will be reviewing this article for GA, and should have the full review up within a couple of hours. Dana boomer (talk) 20:18, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Just one minor prose issue to be addressed before I pass this article for GA, so I'm putting it on hold. Drop me a note if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 20:35, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply above. — Bellhalla (talk) 20:59, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Everything looks good now, so I'm passing the article. Dana boomer (talk) 21:00, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]