Talk:SW1C

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Red-tailed hawk (talk) 01:06, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

HMCS Caraquet with SW1C on top of her mast.
HMCS Caraquet with SW1C on top of her mast.
  • ... that the Canadian-designed SW1C radar's antenna turning system was notoriously unreliable, at one point requiring someone to climb up and turn it using a pipe wrench? Source: proc
    • ALT1: ... that during combat, the Canadian-designed SW1C radar not only failed to find its U-boat target, but also an iceberg near the ship? Source: Cook 117
    • ALT2: ... that the Canadian-designed SW1C radar often became saturated with sea water, requiring someone to climb the mast to turn a valve to blow it out? Source: proc
    • ALT3: ... that the Canadian-designed SW1C radar was so difficult to maintain that the Royal Navy suggested they simply be scrapped? Source: Zimmerman, 55
    • Reviewed:

Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 15:35, 22 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/SW1C; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Will review this in a few hours if no one beats me to it. Cessaune [talk] 15:48, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. This is my first time doing this, so let's see how it goes...

New: checkY Article created on the 22nd.

Long enough: checkY The prose section is long enough.

Cited hook: checkY The hooks are all interesting, particularly the main one and ALT2. The source for those two (proc) seems reliable enough when looking at the sources that the source itself cites.

Image: checkY Image is used in article, is freely licensed, and maintains legibility at 100px.

Within policy: checkY Avoids close paraphrasing, no copyright violations, maintains neutrality, etc.

Needs a QPQ

I think all the hooks are good. DYk ready to main, ALT1, ALT2, AGF to ALT3, however, waiting on QPQ, so . Cessaune [talk] 21:31, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Cessaune: QPQ: 4th Congress of the Communist Party of Lithuania. Thanks! Maury Markowitz (talk) 18:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Cessaune [talk] 18:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]