Talk:Sacred grove

Mythology Mid‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Forestry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Not a sacred grove[edit]

A grove of old trees behind Joseph Smith's barn in Palmyra NY is not a sacred grove in the normal sense that is being discussed in this article. Adding it here flatters the vanity of some contributor perhaps, but serves only to dilute the information and is sure to confuse the reader. The Cathedral of the Pines in Rindge New Hampshire is not mentioned either, don't you see? --Wetman 06:40, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I do. But Because Mormons call the place where Joseph Smith received his First Vision the "Sacred Grove" there should at least be disabiguation. When I googled "Sacred Grove" and LDS/Mormon, I got 13,600 hits; with those two terms excluded I got 165,000 hits. That works out to a bit more than 7% of all Internet references to "Sacred Grove" having to do with some trees near Palmyra, New York. My vanity is neither flattered or unflattered, so I'll leave the problem to you. --John Foxe 13:54, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hebrews?[edit]

Did the Hebrews not have sacred groves also? I've found it difficult to find online references, but I remember reading that in the past concerning a link with Ethiopic Jews and ancient Israel. Can anyone help? Jcchat66 04:35, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sacred Groves = Old European? Huh?[edit]

I find it strange that the lead seems to imply that the concept of "sacred groves"is an exclusive European thing. I have heard of sacred groves in many cultures across the world. If someone does not clarify, I will make changes. --Blacksun 09:31, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do! I'm sure it was more widespread than Europe. Thank you for any help you can bring. Jcchat66 04:18, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No sacred groves for Native Americans?[edit]

I find it hard to believe that no indigenous groups from North or South America had beliefs in sacred groves. This article clearly suffers from Eurocentric blindness, with the exception of random Asian and African regions in the "today" category. Someone will knowledge of Native American religions should make some expansions on this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:200:C000:530:8D43:AA23:C62D:2077 (talk) 00:40, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lucus Pisaurensis[edit]

The Wikipedia article on Lucus Pisaurensis explains in some detail the original, Bronze-Age era concept behind Sacred Groves. The concept has since changed considerably as Yuga cycles descended Isobel Chaveh (talk) 14:02, 13 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Holy trees in the English countryside?[edit]

"Ancient holy trees still exist in the English and Estonian countryside", where in the English countryside? 86.132.220.123 (talk) 10:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Glastonbury is the obvious one. Chiswick Chap (talk) 12:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sacred grove. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070124042747/http://int.kateigaho.com/spr05/forests-sacred.html to http://int.kateigaho.com/spr05/forests-sacred.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sacred grove. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:51, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bohemian Grove?[edit]

The paragraph under United States about the Bohemian Club's Bohemian Grove seems a bizarre inclusion, and besides that there are no citations. The Bohemian Club is a private recreational club, and not a spiritual organization. The purported "symbolic ceremony" is described on the Bohemian Grove's page as a theatrical production. Internetfox (talk) 02:59, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FWIW I agree it's bizarre. I think a link to "sacred grove" *potentially* belongs on the Bohemian Grove page but Bohemian Grove doesn't go on this page. It's not sacred. It's just a social club. Its inclusion is based on a lot of insinuation. jengod (talk) 03:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]