This article was nominated for deletion on 12 November 2012. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
"Called a "logo prodigy" by The New Yorker,[2] and a "wunderkind" by Out magazine"[edit]
It appears in the lead section. Does it follow neutrality guidelines? Tomer T (talk) 22:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Since it is quoting and referencing established independent sources it seems to be legitimate. ABCDian (talk) 21:59, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't question the "factual accuracy" of these statements, because they are indeed quotes, but in order to present the article's subject with proper neutrality, they shouldn't be so emphasized in the leading section. Tomer T (talk) 10:02, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
