Talk:Sahana Software Foundation

Sri Lanka Low‑importance

	Sri Lanka portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sri Lanka, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sri Lanka on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sri LankaWikipedia:WikiProject Sri LankaTemplate:WikiProject Sri LankaSri Lanka articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Speedy deletion is being contested. Article isn't promotional.Timtempleton (talk) 04:35, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article is properly cited and non-advertorial. Please remove template flags.Timtempleton (talk) 01:03, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sahana FOSS Disaster Management System[edit]

I'd like to propose merging Sahana FOSS Disaster Management System here. That article's well out of date, and both its title and one of the project names decribed there are incorrect. Having two articles rather than one seems unnecessary and counterproductive. This article also isn't too long yet for the merge. Dai Pritchard (talk) 19:00, 5 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is completely acceptable - the history section can be expanded to contain most of the details contained in the other article. RamdeshLota (talk) 13:05, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done Klbrain (talk) 16:17, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]