Talk:Salisbury Plain

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiltshire High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wiltshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wiltshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WiltshireWikipedia:WikiProject WiltshireTemplate:WikiProject WiltshireWiltshire articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hampshire Low‑importance

	Hampshire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hampshire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hampshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HampshireWikipedia:WikiProject HampshireTemplate:WikiProject HampshireHampshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

This is a very nice article, and a credit to people who have worked on it. There were a few factual errors though, mainly concerning the area of the plain, so I've addressed these and also taken the opportunity to expand the article a little. Hope everyone likes it, regards Psychostevouk (talk) 15:08, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Map[edit]

Is there not even a rough map available, or one that could be made, showing the approximate boundaries/outline of the plains? The general description is nice and all, but if you're not familiar with the country, you have no idea of its placement in relation to any other famous geological formation or man-made object. --Criticalthinker (talk) 07:02, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For comparison see New Forest, where there's a map at a very low definition. You could do that for Salisbury Plain, but there's no doubt it's a bit of a movable feast, as the meaning of West Country is. Moonraker2 (talk) 04:50, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ecology[edit]

I have added a whole lot of stuff on ecology, mostly taken from the SSSI citation. I don't think there is a copyright issue here since it is information in the public domain, but nevertheless it could do with a lot of tidying to make it look less like a list. Pahazzard (talk) 00:20, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Salisbury Plain Training Area[edit]

Its probably time we had a separate Page for this. It already has links going to it that come to this page, but should go to a military page. Should one simply copy and paste the info from this Page and build on it ? IceDragon64 (talk) 21:49, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I had the same thought in the past but the present section of this article seems OK. It's not too long and most of the details are in the articles on the individual establishments. Do you have ideas for adding more information to make a longer separate article? -- Wire723 (talk) 08:43, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]