Jump to content

Talk:Sally Mugabe

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Peacock Terms

[edit]

Parts of this article read more like a hagiography than an objective biography.

71.199.115.131 (talk) 00:20, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've reworded everything I regarded to be peacock terms. Did I miss any? Sf46 (talk) 00:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sally Mugabe.jpg

[edit]

Image:Sally Mugabe.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First Lady in 1980?

[edit]

I notice that the article says she became First Lady in 1980. While Canaan Banana's presidency was largely ceremonial and Mugabe did run the country, I believe that technically Banana's wife would have been considered First Lady at that time. Hayfron would have become First Lady in 1987 when her husband officially took over as president. If that is not the case, this assertion will need some justification from a source.--Gloriamarie 18:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Sally Mugabe.jpg

[edit]

Image:Sally Mugabe.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 22:44, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Amai

[edit]

The term is common knowledge for any Zimbabwean. I do not see how this can need citation. Mangwanani (talk) 18:45, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May well be, but Wikipedia is a a global project. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 18:51, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I never said it wasn't. There is no point citing general knowledge fact, otherwise every single sentence on Wikipedia would require a citation, which, in my view, is ridiculous. Mangwanani (talk) 18:55, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
But it's not general knowledge for people who don't live in Zimbabwe. It's an important claim as it asserts she was popular. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 19:02, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well she was but if you really do need the citation for luck, it is mentioned several times on the Zimbabwe First Day Covers with her on and here and here and here (which says "Sally was incredibly popular") aand here. Fact enough yet? Mangwanani (talk) 19:29, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Sarah"

[edit]

A claim emerged lately that the name was reportedly "Sarah" and the only source available (until now) is from Britain. As the article concerns a Zimabweab personality and Britain has no jurisdiction since 1980 there, I suggest to the contributor of the claim to find a Zimbabwean source or to write "Sally Mugabe" as the main name and Sarah as "a. k. a.". Otherwise this would be a pro-British, pro-colonial POV (in case there are no Zimbabweab sources for Sarah). If we pursue this way, we should rename the title in "Ljubljana" to Laibach and write "a. k. a. Ljubljana", simply because it has been German in the past, which would be an insupportable historical revisionism (the same here, provided that no Z. sources emerge) Bogorm (talk) 21:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems a little over-the-top to insert a "neutrality disputed" tag in this case, since "Sally" is a common Nickname for people christened "Sarah". There is no 'neutrality' issue involved. The source provided (UK National Archives) derives from an application form from a "Sarah Francesca Mugabe" of "Ghanaian descent" for permission to reside and work in the UK. It has nothing in the slightest to do with being pro-British or pro-colonial; it is a matter of accuracy. The article states that she was also known as "Sally Mugabe", so where's the problem? --TraceyR (talk) 18:44, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The problem is that the source is non-Zimbabwean and only Zimbabwean documents are entitled to decide over naming. What if someone writes in Bismarck "a. k. a. Bisumaruku", just because in numerous official Japanese documents he was named thus? As a conclusion, please do not remove the tag, since the source is colonial and does not stem from the Republic of Zimbabwe. Bogorm (talk) 20:19, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The Republic of Zimbabwe did not exist at the time, so it has no relevance. Sally Mugabe was Ghanaian and presumably the UK authorities got her name from her Ghanaian passport. This has nothing to do with Zimbabwe, colonial politics, Japanese and German namimg conventions. Again, it is a simple matter of accuracy. The tag is both inaccurate and itself non-neutral. Please keep to the point. Thanks. --TraceyR (talk) 04:05, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The following information is from the official Zimbabwean government biography webpage here of Robert Mugabe:"Married April 1961 to the late Sarah Francesca Hayfron (1932 - 1992)". --TraceyR (talk) 16:55, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Title

[edit]

Why is her married (and final legal) name a redirect and her birth name the title? Babakathy (talk) 17:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

I noticed that one of the main references and the only external link "The love that made Robert Mugabe a monster" written by Robert Verkaik for the Independent leads to a broken link. Strangely enough, I went to The Independent website and tried to look under their archive search for the article published in April 6, 2008 to no avail. I wonder if there's a reason why The Independent has removed the published article online. I guess if anyone wants to go through the trouble of editing the page, the following URL can be used as a source since it has the article to its entirety and crediting author and source: http://adalvoice.wordpress.com/2008/04/06/the-love-that-made-robert-mugabe-a-monster-independent-uk/ Sailorsaturn (talk) 13:12, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Sally Hayfron. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:10, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]