Talk:Sam Cho

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Why are there so many unsupported claims on this page that keep being put back in? No source supports what Sam did his thesis on. No source supports what activities he undertook while in college. There are a variety of unsupported statements that have zero veracity and it is embarrassing Elah cix (talk) 05:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unsubstantiated claims on this page[edit]

There are a bunch of unsubstantiated claims on Sam's page that violate many Wikipedia guidelines for biography of a living person yet they keep being reverted in bad faith. Why is that? Elah cix (talk) 05:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I removed additional unsupported claims on this page (i.e. that Sam was the youngest port commissioner ever, that he staffed certain actives in congress). If there are sources that support these claims please cite them instead of just reverting my edits. Elah cix (talk) 16:49, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I removed additional unsupported claims about Sam's endorsements and them being in spite of his low name recognition. There was no source cited for the endorsements and there was no source cited that it was "in spite of" name recognition or lack there of. If there are sources that support these claims please cite them instead of just reverting my edits. Elah cix (talk) 16:54, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removed statement that Cho was a political appointee as that was not supported in the citation. Referenced the position in the GSA instead. Also changed the term arbitrage to exploit the price differentials. Arbitrage is generally used for simultaneous or near simultaneous trades. Elah cix (talk) 19:13, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Misoaqua98: Why do you keep changing my edits and not engaging in a discussion?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Elah cix (talkcontribs)

@Misoaqua98: you have been consistently reverting Elah cix for over a week now, and you have yet to make a single post to this talk page. How are you two ever going to sort this out without discussion? One diff I checked (this one) has Misoaqua98 adding back the thesis description that Elah cix correctly removed, seeing as it was not in the given source. --- Possibly (talk) 22:14, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I undid Misoaquas changes as they don't have sources (i.e. thesis description, etc). I would like to engage in a discussion @Misoaqua98: and would be happy to revert any changes I made in error, but all I am doing is removing things that aren't supported by any of the citations. I've read them all. Elah cix (talk) 23:06, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]