Talk:Samuel Shute

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSamuel Shute has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 18, 2013Good article nomineeListed

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Samuel Shute/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dana boomer (talk · contribs) 00:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'll take this article for review for GA status, and should have my initial comments up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 00:59, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    • Early life, first paragraph. Perhaps move the link for Dissenter from the description of the brother to where in first appears, in the description of the grandfather? Also, in the description of the grandfather, the term is lower-case, while the two other times it appears in this section, it is upper-case.
    • Early life, " They also informed Shute of the political situation in the province after he won the appointment." This sentence confuses me. What is it supposed to mean? They misled him before he won the appointment?
    • Disputes with Massachusetts assembly, "(The salary issue was a regular source of disagreement between the provincial assembly and the governor until the Belcher administration of the 1730s.)" Possibly take this sentence out of parentheses and reframe it as "The salary issue would continue to be a regular source..."?
    • Indian policy, "(which the British claimed also encompassed all of present-day New Brunswick)" Huh? I don't understand what this is trying to say.
    • Indian policy, "had not signed any treaties at all." Redundant. The last two words can be removed.
    • Indian policy, "The Kennebec sachem" Link or explain sachem.
    • Indian policy, link to Kennebec tribe should be moved to first occurrence of tribe name.
    • Do we know what happened in the last 13 years of his life? Even a general outline?
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • In references, but not notes: Dictionary of National Biography (first reference)
    • In notes, but not references: Malone
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Overall very nice. A few confusing spots and linking issues in the prose that need to be ironed out, and a couple of minor reference issues, but mainly small things. Once these are taken care of, the article should be good to go for GA status. Dana boomer (talk) 01:43, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've made changes to address the above issues. Shute is not (to my knowledge, despite seeking) covered in anything other than fairly brief biographical sketches -- if a multi-page memorial of his life existed (something I've not found), it might say what if anything happened after 1728. Consequently most of what we know of him is from materials related to his Massachusetts service. (If you think this 13-year gap is bad, the last 30 years of William Dummer's life appear to be completely undocumented.) Magic♪piano 22:40, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, everything looks good with your changes, so I'm promoting the article to GA. Thanks for the quick reply! Dana boomer (talk) 01:42, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

death date for Samuel Shute[edit]

the death date listed in the text at the end is different from the death date in the box at the top ... it stood out to me and i couldn't verify either quickly using the references for the date in the text, so i thought i'd comment here. Gov. Shute was granted a lot of land during the time he was in New Hampshire because as new towns were being granted (Nottingham and Chester are of interest to me), the governor was routinely granted a large 500-acre or so lot in addition to the regular proprietors.

i was looking for general information about Samuel Shute because of land that was granted to him in Nottingham, New Hampshire, and trying to follow the chain-of-title, it went to Shute Shrimpton Yeamons, which is an unusual name and made me think that perhaps Saml. Shute had a daughter that named a son after her maiden name, but the wikipedia article points out that he never married.

thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ddzulager (talkcontribs) 19:50, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The difference in the death dates is due to changes between Julian and Gregorian calendars (15 day differential, new year beginning in March). This should probably be clarified. Magic♪piano 01:33, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]