Talk:San Diego Freeway

This article was nominated for deletion on 31 October 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was redirect to Interstate 405 (California).

This set index article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

San Diego

This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego articles

WikiProject San Diego To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate San Diego related articles from Category:Unassessed San Diego articles and Category:Unknown-importance San Diego articles with the {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner.
Cleanup : A cleanup listing for this project is available: clean-up listing for San_Diego
Expand : San Miguel Mountain, Most articles from Category:Stub-Class San Diego articles.
Photo : Request photos that are needed from Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in San Diego County, California to include in each article.
Stubs : Work on articles in Category:San Diego County, California, geography stubs.
Other : * Add {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner to related articles' talk pages and assess.
- Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
- Get San Diego into Featured article status.
- Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

U.S. Roads: Interstates / California SIA‑class

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
SIA	This article has been rated as SIA-class on the project's quality scale.
Topics	Interstate Highways
Locations	California
	This article may or may not have a map. Please check, then add `\|needs-map=` to this template accordingly.
	This article may or may not contain a junction list. Please check, then add `\|needs-jctint=` to this template accordingly.

merge with i-405

I think we should keep this merge to I-405. Most of this article contains infos of I-405, we want to avoid control cities and list of cities. We have too little infos of I-5.--Free way guy 04:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. San Diego Freeway should be a disambig page that redirects to I-405 and I-5 in California. No reason to duplicate the information from all of 405 and part of 5 on this article. Gateman1997 (talk) 01:00, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And also Control Cities is something we want to try to avoid specific details. The whole portion of I-405 is San Diego Fwy both Los Angeles and Orange County, at Sotuh Orange County it becomes a 5. But still no purpose to have a article is superflow. Golden State Fwy only contains I-5 from East LA inter. to SR 99, but the info is long enough to keep it a seperate page.--Free way guy 22:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will have to merge this article.--Free way guy 02:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gateman wants a disambig page, Freewayguy wants to merge. I think we should keep the status quo. A disambiguation page isn't exactly user friendly, there's nothing wrong with duplicating information, as long as it is not contradictory. A merge requires considerable effort to ensure that no information is deleted, I don't think it's a good idea. -Synchronism (talk) 05:22, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, the article should be turned into a disambig page. There is no info worth saving on this page. Most of it is lists and should not exist (per WP:USRD) and the rest is duplicated. --Rschen7754 (T C) 06:24, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I recognize that there is superfluousness. Disambiguation can be done nicely I guess, and it's more honest than merging.Synchronism (talk) 07:36, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]