Talk:San Francisco values

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Don't merge San Francisco Values

To be fair, whether or not you agree with them, these sometimes negative labels or concepts have been earned and are part of our culture. To put these labels under the nice title of "liberal elite" seems something like cultural activism. I will assume that a liberal came up up with this idea. Truthsader (talk) 19:38, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

San Francisco values are unique and I have added an insight into the institutional basis for these values under a heading changed from push-back to positive usage. This section demonstrates the way San Francisco State University perpetuates these values in a liberal microcosm unique to San Francisco. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegarrick (talk • contribs) 17:00, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research

The media usage section is good but the first two paragraphs need work. --Treekids (talk) 00:11, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merger

I have preposed merging the following articles to the LIBERAL ELITE article.

Firstly, they all say much of the same thing and secondly if they were all brought together it would give a worldwide viewpoint instead into "Liberal elitism" instead of having a US bias. I will copy this message on all the other article talk pages. All discussions should be done on the LIBERAL ELITE talk page so that all discussions are kept together. — Realist² (Who's Bad?) 05:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Liberal-leaning San Francisco radio hosts

I don't know if his syndicated show is off the air but I believe Peter B. Collins may have a show or fill in at ABC-owned KGO Radio, San Franciso. I haven't had the chance to listen to him but there are a number of liberal SF radio talk show hosts, a few at KGO, who may gladly be associated with "San Francisco values."

DonL (talk) 10:15, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on San Francisco values. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070930031519/http://www.sfbg.com/blogs/politics/2006/11/san_francisco_values.html to http://www.sfbg.com/blogs/politics/2006/11/san_francisco_values.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:04, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]