Talk:Sand whiting

Sand whiting has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 31, 2007	Good article nominee	Listed

Fishes Mid‑importance

	Fish portal This article is part of WikiProject Fishes, an attempt to organise a detailed guide to all topics related to Fish taxa. To participate, you can edit the attached article, or contribute further at WikiProject Fishes. This project is an offshoot of the WikiProject Tree of Life.FishesWikipedia:WikiProject FishesTemplate:WikiProject FishesFishes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fisheries and Fishing Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fisheries and Fishing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fisheries, aquaculture and fishing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fisheries and FishingWikipedia:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingTemplate:WikiProject Fisheries and FishingFishing articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Biota Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Sand whiting is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

GA Review

This article meets the GA criteria, and has been passed. The prose is good, readable, and interesting. References are overall sufficient, although it would help to have dates of retrieval added to the external links provided as inline citations (see WP:CITE). The article would benefit from have some more images or photos added to it, as it would help clarify some things. For example, a map illustration added to the range and habitat section would help.

Overall, the article looks good! There's no major significant issues. Cheers! Dr. Cash 00:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that Derek, i will have to go back and redo nearly all the citations as "cite journal" and "cite book" sometime soon. As for images, i fully agree, but free images are suprisingly hard to come by. You would think for such a popular species, there would be images on Flickr etc, but there are none. Being i live in South Australia and not the eastern sates, its not easy to go haul a few sandies from the nearest beach either. As for the map, there is one in the taxobox. I put it there because the FA shark articles also have the range map in the taxobox, so i'll leave it there for the moment. Cheers Kare Kare 02:09, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 21:22, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]